The Story of Open Minds
Ch 5: Why My Critique Partners Are Smarter Than Me
Ch 6: Facing Revisions When It Feels Like Being on the Rack
Ch 7: How to Know When to Query
Ch 8: A Writer’s Journey: Self-Publishing Open Minds (Part 1)
Ch 9: Owning theWriterly Path:Self-Publishing Open Minds (Part 2)
Epilogue: Finding Time to Write the Sequel
Why My Critique Partners Are Smarter
Than Me
This title probably sounds like I'm kissing up to my
critique partners. And while they are awesome and deserve all the praise I can
give them (especially the ones that critiqued my paranormal/SF novel Open Minds),
that's not quite what I mean.
Robert McKee, in his screenwriting book Story,
talks about how the collective IQ of the audience goes up 25 points as the
lights dim down. Every sense is tuned to the visual, verbal, and musical cues
on the screen. Years of storytelling in the form of movies, books, and TV have trained the audience's intuition. They know the
tropes by instinct, and while they probably couldn't tell you why, they just
KNOW that the creepy character in the first act is going to come back and be
the villain in the end.
Have you ever watched a movie where you
"totally saw that coming"? Yeah, me too.
Writing a story that can keep that hyper-attuned
audience in the dark until just the right reveal is an extremely difficult
task. The writer has to plant just enough clues, but not too many. Provide just
the right mood, but not sloppily slurp into cliché-land. Give just enough
romance and meaning and depth to move the audience and not so much that it
makes them cringe.
Critique partners are the movie-preview audience of
the novel world.
When I was writing Open
Minds,
I went through round after round of critiques from different sets of writer
friends who were generous enough to add their expertise to help make the story
better. If you read the acknowledgements page in the back of Open Minds,
you'll see what I mean. A LOT of writers helped craft this story into its final
form and each contributed an important insight into the story. Any reader can
give feedback about whether a story "works" for them, but
writer-readers are extra helpful in that they can help pinpoint how to fix it
as well.
When I return the favor of a critique, I try to give
feedback to my writer friend about how the story would be received by a
hyper-tuned reader. But I also try to make suggestions for improvements.
Sometimes I leave it vague ("more emotional connection needed here"
or "I'm not really liking this character—is that the reaction you want me
to have?"); sometimes I get more specific ("Reorder this scene to put
the high impact point last" or "We need a kiss here"). When I'm
very lucky, a crit partner will ask me to help show how to reword or rewrite a
small scene. Somehow these scenes always seem to be kissing related, and I
joked with a critique friend that I was changing my business card from
"Author and Rocket Scientist" to "Author, Rocket Scientist, and
Kissing Consultant." (Note: Yes, there are kisses in Open Minds,
but nowhere as many as Life,
Liberty, and Pursuit—that was a
love story after all.)
I relish these times that I can pay back a small bit
of the help I get from my brilliant critique partners.
When my critique partners read my MS, they are
hyper-attuned like the readers that I hope will someday read the book. Those
readers, as soon as they crack open my book or switch on their e-readers, will
become savvy, impossibly smart story consumers. Don't underestimate them. They
will see your plot twists coming. They will want to be surprised, moved to
tears, made to laugh out loud. If you want to deliver a great reading
experience for them, if you want to light up their imagination in a way that
will rival two hours in a dark theatre, make sure you pretest your novel with
critique partners. They will help you find the sluggish plot points, the
stereotyped characters, and implausible action sequences before your readers
do.
And if they suggest a kiss, let me know if you need
a consultant. :)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Share Your Thought Waves